Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42252600›Full record

ArticleEvolution & development2026

Non-Invaginated Wing Primordia in Holometabolous Insects: First Report From Mecoptera.

Shuhei Niitsu, Ryo Ishihara, Takehiko Kamito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuhei NiitsuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5532-7498
Ryo IshiharaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Takehiko KamitoDepartment of Arts and Sciences, International Christian University, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K09597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents the first detailed histological description of wing primordium development in Mecoptera and demonstrates a late-forming, non-invaginated developmental mode lacking a morphologically distinct peripodial epithelium. Wing primordium development in holometabolous insects follows two major modes, early-forming and late-forming. Late-forming primordia are epidermal cell populations that remain integrated within the larval epithelium, contribute to cuticle production during each larval molt, and begin morphogenesis only in the final instar. The order Mecoptera remains among the least studied groups of Holometabola with respect to wing primordium development. Using a newly established rearing method and histological analysis, we investigated wing development in the scorpionfly Mavropanorpa japonica and found the following: (1) wing primordia are absent in actively feeding larvae; (2) they originate as localized epidermal thickenings beneath the lateral pinacula approximately 20 days after cocoon formation; (3) thickening of wing primordia begins concurrently with apolysis, and the epithelium extends outward without pouch-like invagination; and (4) no morphologically distinct peripodial epithelium was observed at all stages. Our findings show that wing primordia in Mecoptera develop externally, without invagination and without formation of a morphologically distinct peripodial epithelium. This study provides new comparative insight into heterochronic shifts and evolutionary diversity in holometabolous wing development.

Indexed as

HolometabolaInsectaWings, AnimalAnimalsLarvaHolometabolaMecopterametamorphosisnon‐invaginated wing primordia

Identifiers

PMID42252600
PMCPMC13243817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.