ArticleInternational wound journal2026
High Adherence to Remote Monitoring Technology in Patients at Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulcer.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, a lower-extremity amputation occurs every 20 s as a complication of a diabetic foot ulcer, underscoring the urgent need for effective preventive strategies. Previous studies have shown that temperature-based foot monitoring can reduce both the incidence and severity of diabetic foot ulcers. However, real-world adherence data for remote temperature monitoring remain limited, particularly in diverse or resource-constrained communities. We conducted a pilot implementation study of 20 adults with diabetes and a history of diabetic foot ulcers to assess adherence to a remote foot temperature monitoring mat within the context of receiving podiatric care. Participants are instructed to stand on the mat for 20 s daily, and data are transmitted wirelessly for remote monitoring. Adherence was defined as use of the mat at least four times a week. Participants demonstrated high adherence to the foot monitoring mat, averaging 6 scans per week, with sustained adherence over the 6-month study period. These findings suggest that high-risk patients with diabetes can reliably engage with the foot temperature monitoring technology, supporting its potential as a management tool to improve outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetic foot ulcer-related complications in high-risk, resource constrained patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.