ArticleEcho research and practice2026
Significance of echocardiographic metrics including TRV and TAPSE/SPAP in mild haemodynamic pulmonary hypertension - data from EVIDENCE-PAH UK.
Article in Echo research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines redefined pulmonary hypertension (PH) as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg on right heart catheterisation (RHC). Echocardiography, using metrics such as tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and TAPSE/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/SPAP), guides referral for RHC. However, the few studies evaluating echocardiographic performance using the ESC/ERS 2022 thresholds have combined the newly included population as a relatively modest subgroup within their overall analysis.
resultsWe present a sample of 1,991 individuals from the EVIDENCE-PAH UK database. Our data demonstrate higher TRV and sPAP values and lower TAPSE/SPAP values with higher haemodynamic category. ROC analysis demonstrates that TRV, SPAP and TAPSE/SPAP perform well as predictors of mPAP > 20 mmHg and ≥25 mmHg (AUCs 0.785-0.830), but less well at predictive mPAP 21-24 mmHg (AUCs 0.656-0.686). In all PH patients and the mild PH (21-24 mmHg) subgroup, TAPSE/SPAP < 0.31 mm/mmHg predicted reduced survival (HR 2.01-3.14, p < 0.001). Similarly, in haemodynamically mild PH, TRV > 3.4 m/s was associated with worse survival compared to TRV < 2.5 m/s or 2.5-2.8 m/s (p < 0.001).
conclusionsWhile established echocardiographic metrics (TRV, TAPSE/SPAP) are strong predictors of significant PH (mPAP ≥25 mmHg), they are less accurate for mild PH (mPAP 21-24 mmHg). Importantly, mild PH itself is associated with increased mortality, and within this group, TRV >3.4 m/s and TAPSE/SPAP <0.31 mm/mmHg identify patients at highest risk, supporting their prognostic utility even in early haemodynamic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.