SynthesisAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Plasma p-tau as a biomarker for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the clinical implementation of amyloid-targeting therapies, accurately differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD) from other neurodegenerative dementias is imperative. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized data on the diagnostic performance of three plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) isoforms identified through a comprehensive literature search, namely p-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231.
methodsWe searched major databases up to November 30, 2025, for studies comparing blood p-tau levels in AD versus biologically confirmed non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Data were synthesized using bivariate random-effects models to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).
resultsThirty-three studies comprising 6,138 participants were included. Blood p-tau biomarkers demonstrated robust overall accuracy (AUC 0.90) and a high positive likelihood ratio (PLR 3.77). Comparison of isoforms revealed that plasma p-tau217 exhibited superior performance (AUC 0.95; Sensitivity 0.93) with a remarkable DOR of 57.98, which was nearly six-fold higher than that of p-tau231 (DOR 9.83). Subgroup analyses showed exceptional specificity for differentiating AD from behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (0.91) and vascular dementia (0.83), but discriminative ability against dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) was significantly lower (Specificity 0.69; DOR 7.54). Furthermore, plasma-based assays (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96) significantly outperformed serum-based methods (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.78), as evidenced by non-overlapping confidence intervals.
conclusionsPlasma p-tau217 is the superior biomarker for the differential diagnosis of AD, particularly for ruling out FTD, though distinguishing AD from DLB remains challenging due to mixed pathology. The distinct superiority of plasma over serum supports the exclusive use of plasma-based protocols for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.