ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Comparative analysis of morphology and gut microbiome underlying trophic niche differentiation in three stomatopod species.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given that predatory strategies and trophic niche in stomatopods vary with raptorial appendage differentiation, a comparative analysis was conducted on three species (Odontodactylus japonicus, Lysiosquilla sulcirostris, and Oratosquilla oratoria) exhibiting distinct habitats and morphologies. The study measured their raptorial appendage morphology, digestive tract morphology, and gut microbiota. The results revealed significant differences in the raptorial appendages and digestive tract morphology among the three stomatopod species. O. japonicus has the significantly largest merus length, merus width, merus height and, L. sulcirostris has the significantly largest propodus length, dactylus length, hepatopancreas length and midgut length, while O. oratoria has the significantly largest hindgut length, cardiac stomach length and pyloric stomach length. Regarding digestive tract morphology, O. japonicus possessed the widest villus and tallest villus, in contrast to O. oratoria, which displayed the smallest values for these features. A total of 8,273 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained from all 16S rRNA sequences. The OTU numbers for O. oratoria, L. sulcirostris, and O. japonicus were 344, 113, and 82, respectively, with only 17 OTUs shared among all three species. The gut microbiota of O. japonicus was dominated by the phylum Pseudomonadota (88.90%), primarily comprised of the genus Cupriavidus (68.40%). In contrast, the dominant phylum in both L. sulcirostris and O. oratoria was Bacillota, with Mycoplasma being the dominant genus in each, respectively. Furthermore, O. oratoria exhibited the highest gut microbial diversity, whereas L. sulcirostris had the lowest. Functional profiling revealed that the relative abundance of gut microbiota associated with amino acid, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism was significantly higher in O. japonicus than in both O. oratoria and L. sulcirostris. In conclusion, our findings provide further evidence for feeding habit differentiation and associated regulatory mechanisms among the three stomatopod species. The high gut microbial diversity in O. oratoria may contribute to its adaptability to the dynamic, heterogeneous habitats it occupies. Although the microbial abundance in O. japonicus is intermediate between that of O. oratoria and L. sulcirostris, its microbiota appears to be more efficient in digestive function, particularly in the metabolism of key nutrients. This study systematically elucidates the regulatory mechanisms underlying trophic niche differentiation in stomatopods from integrated morphological and physiological perspectives. Our findings provide a valuable foundation for future research on the evolution of higher taxonomic groups within Stomatopoda based on nutritional ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.