ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Uterine torsion caused by a giant uterine fibroid in late pregnancy: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUterine torsion during pregnancy is a relatively rare obstetric emergency that can occur in all stages of pregnancy. Among all kinds of acute abdomen during pregnancy, uterine torsion during pregnancy is a special type that is rare and poses a significant threat to the safety of mothers and infants. Failure to recognize clinical signs promptly and the absence of established diagnostic and treatment protocols represent persistent difficulties in managing obstetric emergencies. CASE PRESENTATION: This study presents a case of uterine torsion caused by a giant uterine leiomyoma during the third trimester of pregnancy, in which the fetus was presented in the transverse position. Intraoperative examination revealed that the uterus had undergone a clockwise rotation of > 90°. Manual detorsion was initially attempted; however, owing to the obvious space-occupying effect of fibroids, restricted operative space, and markedly increased myometrial tone, multiple reductions were unsuccessful. The uterus was then rotated to the right about 45°, and an incision was created in the lower uterine segment on the posterior wall. A viable neonate was delivered in the cephalic presentation. The newborn achieved an Apgar score of 10 at both 1 and 5 min post‑delivery. Postoperatively, the patient made an uneventful recovery and was discharged according to the planned schedule.
conclusionsUterine torsion is a rare yet life-threatening obstetric emergency, characterized by a lack of specific clinical manifestations. The present case underscores the importance of early recognition, particularly in patients presenting with large fibroids and an abnormal fetal lie. Meticulous intraoperative decision-making is essential to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes. When manual or surgical reduction proves unfeasible intraoperatively, a posterior cesarean delivery or other tailored surgical strategies may be employed to safeguard maternal and fetal well‑being and thereby enhance pregnancy prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.