SynthesisBMC medical education2026
Moral courage in health sciences students: a systematic review of challenges, influencing factors, and consequences.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMoral courage is the critical bridge between ethical knowledge and ethical action in healthcare. While health sciences students often possess high moral sensitivity, they frequently struggle to act on their values due to the "theory-practice gap" and the pressures of clinical hierarchies. The suppression of moral courage not only compromises patient safety but is also closely associated with moral distress and professional burnout among trainees.
objectivesThis systematic review aims to critically analyze the global evidence regarding the prevalence of moral courage among health sciences students and to identify the barriers, facilitators, and consequences associated with moral courage in educational settings.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251057915). A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published from 2000 to March 2025. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.
resultsA total of 21 studies, comprising 4,719 participants from diverse cultural contexts, were included. The findings reveal a disciplinary divergence in moral courage: nursing students generally exhibited moderate-to-high levels, whereas medical and dental students reported lower levels, often constrained by rigid hierarchies. The primary barriers identified were the "hidden curriculum," fear of negative evaluation, and hierarchical power dynamics. Conversely, key facilitators included positive role modeling, a strong sense of moral agency, and supportive peer environments.
conclusionStudents largely perceive the deficit in moral courage as a systemic issue rather than an individual failure. Current educational models often prioritize compliance over advocacy, creating a perceived conflict between academic survival and ethical action for trainees. To foster active moral agents, medical education must reframe moral courage as a trainable "non-technical skill" and implement systemic reforms to dismantle the culture of silence in clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.