ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
Potato foliar infection with Phytophthora infestans drives strong, cultivar-specific shifts in rhizosphere communities.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPotato is an important crop worldwide, yet its production is severely threatened by Phytophthora infestans, the causal agent of late blight. Alternatives to the current control strategies are needed, as these rely heavily on environmentally harmful treatments. The recruitment of beneficial microbes by plants upon stress ("cry-for-help" mechanism) may represent an opportunity to find new biocontrol agents but this has not yet been reported for potato. The aim of this study was to analyse whether foliar late blight infection induces shifts in the phyllosphere, rhizosphere and soil bacterial communities associated with two potato cultivars of differing sensitivity to late blight. Moreover, we aimed at isolating plant microbiota members to test whether bacteria putatively recruited upon infection would be particularly active in protecting the plant against late blight.
resultsControlled foliar infection triggered substantial, cultivar-specific shifts in rhizosphere communities across two successive generations. Despite the number of differentially abundant ASVs detected being ten times higher in the second generation than in the first one, the same taxonomic groups were involved in the shifts: Burkholderiales, Flavobacteriales, and Bacillales. Furthermore, the communities linked to the susceptible cultivar consistently shifted more strongly upon infection than the communities linked to the resistant cultivar. The obtained ASV sequences were used to identify 163 corresponding isolates through sequence alignment. Their inhibition potential against P. infestans sporangia and zoospores was assessed through biological assays. These revealed the biocontrol potential of genera otherwise not yet known to inhibit phytopathogenic organisms, such as Advenella, Nocardioides and Phyllobacterium strains. Although we found no correlation between the relative abundance shift of the ASVs upon infection and the activity of the corresponding strains, we observed that the overall activity of strains isolated from the resistant cultivar was higher than that of the strains isolated from the susceptible one.
conclusionTaken together, the higher activity of the strains isolated from the resistant cultivar, along with its comparatively modest microbiome shifts upon infection suggest that the investigated resistant cultivar might harbour specific microbiota enriched in strains that are able to inhibit pathogen development and possibly contribute to its higher resistance against P. infestans.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.