ArticleScientific reports2026
The potential usefulness of health asset valuation to promote health among Korean employees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aim to investigate perceptions of health asset value (HAV) among South Korean employees. We conducted an interviewer-administered nationwide survey to investigate perceptions of health asset valuations for the 1,000 Korean employees. Most respondents (63.4%-80.4%) agree on estimating the economic value of health assets and their implications. Higher education participants have more positive attitudes toward participating in personalized health improvement activities that increase the value of health assets (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.21, 95% CI 1.35-3.61). Participants with higher income tend to have more positive attitudes toward health assets, believing that they have economic value (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.82), considering systematic evaluation of health assets to be helpful for health management (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.11-2.09), and showing a willingness to continuously use programs that assess the value of health assets (aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.37-2.85). Among the health status factors, good mental health is positively associated with a willingness to pay for health improvement programs (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.89). Finally, good spiritual health increases the likelihood of viewing health assets as having economic value (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05-2), considering the systematic evaluation of health assets as helpful for health management (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01-2.01), and being willing to pay for health improvement programs based on the value of health assets (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.11-2.06). This study suggests the potential usefulness of HAV to promote health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.