ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Learning curve and surgical time predictors in robot-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning for operative time prediction in robotic ventral hernia repair patients: Perspective on predictive model development and validation.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify factors associated with operative time and evaluate the learning curve of robot-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (RA-vNOTES) using conventional and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses. In this single-surgeon retrospective study, a total of 116 patients who underwent RA-vNOTES for benign gynecologic disease between December 2021 and August 2024 were included. To evaluate the learning curve, both conventional CUSUM and RA-CUSUM analyses were performed. Expected operative time for each case was estimated using a multivariable linear regression model including body mass index (BMI), uterine weight (per 100 g), and parity. RA-CUSUM was calculated as the cumulative sum of observed minus expected operative time. Multivariable linear regression models identified higher BMI (p = 0.001) and greater uterine weight (p < 0.001) as independent predictors of prolonged total operative time. No significant predictors were identified for docking time or console time. Transition plots and conventional CUSUM demonstrated progressive procedural improvement over time. RA-CUSUM analysis identified peak learning points at approximately 31 cases for docking time, 32 cases for console time, and 30 cases for total operative time, indicating stabilization after approximately 30-32 cases. Operative time stabilization in RA-vNOTES was achieved after approximately 30 to 32 cases in this single-surgeon experience. Higher BMI and greater uterine weight are significant predictors of longer total operative time. RA-CUSUM provides a more accurate assessment of the learning curve by accounting for patient-related variability, which may inform surgical training strategies and case selection during the implementation of RA-vNOTES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42252327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.