ArticleScientific reports2026
SwiftMSeg: lightweight multi-scale local-global context modeling with transformer for medical image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate medical image segmentation requires both fine boundary localization and robust contextual understanding, which is often difficult to achieve simultaneously, particularly in lightweight architectures. In this paper, we propose SwiftMSeg, a lightweight encoder-decoder framework that integrates a convolutional encoder, a transformer-based local-global-local module, and a hierarchical multi-scale decoder. The proposed framework addresses the boundary-context challenge by effectively combining progressive multi-scale refinement for fine boundary separation with global context modeling through long-range dependency aggregation. Extensive evaluations on publicly available colonoscopy, pathology, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging datasets demonstrated the capability of SwiftMSeg to accurately segment diverse anatomical structures, ranging from tiny nuclei to polyps and large tumor regions. The model further demonstrated moderate domain-independent generalization on an external dataset, achieving Dice scores of 0.896 (colonoscopy), 0.860 (pathology), 0.850 (ultrasound), and 0.870 (MRI), consistently outperforming most baseline methods. In addition, it achieved improved boundary localization with lower Hausdorff distance (e.g., 16.43 in MRI and 33.89 in ultrasound) and reduced average symmetric surface distance, indicating more precise and stable segmentation. Statistical analysis further confirmed that the improvements of SwiftMSeg are significant ([Formula: see text]) with large effect sizes across modalities, validated by both paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests. Despite its strong performance, SwiftMSeg remains highly efficient, requiring only 4.48M parameters and 0.940 giga floating-point operations per second (GFLOPs), reducing computational cost by approximately ∼53× compared to the U-Net-based baselines (standard U-Net ∼31M parameters and ∼50 GFLOPs), while maintaining high segmentation accuracy. These results highlight the effectiveness of SwiftMSeg as a practical and scalable solution for real-world medical image segmentation across diverse modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.