Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42252310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Numerical assessment of failure load and soil-footing contact stress distribution for concrete foundations on cohesionless soil.

Zaid S Alajlan, Sabry Fayed, El-Said A Bayoumi, Saad A Yehia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zaid S AlajlanDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia. z.alajlan@psau.edu.sa.
Sabry FayedCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kafr Elsheikh University, Kafr El-Shaikh, Egypt.
El-Said A BayoumiConstruction and Building Engineering Department, Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Tanta, Egypt.
Saad A YehiaCivil Engineering Department, Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behavior of isolated reinforced concrete (RC) footings is strongly influenced by the interaction between the footing and supporting soil, which governs settlement, load capacity, and contact stress distribution. Classical analytical solutions often overestimate edge stresses and fail to account for soil nonlinearity, progressive footing cracking, and stiffness degradation. Experimental studies have shown non-uniform, saddle-shaped stress distributions beneath rigid foundations, yet most research focuses on idealized footings, and conventional design methods typically assume uniform contact stresses, overlooking the evolution of footing stiffness. This study addresses these gaps by developing a validated nonlinear finite element (FE) model in ABAQUS to simulate square RC footings on dense sandy soil under concentric vertical loading. The model was validated against experimental results, showing 1% discrepancy in ultimate load and 3% in settlement. A parametric study investigated the effects of reinforcement ratio (0.26-3.0%), footing thickness (250-500 mm), and concrete compressive strength (20-60 MPa). Increasing reinforcement ratio raised central contact stress by 102%, ultimate load by 111%, and energy absorption by 312%. Increasing thickness to 500 mm improved central stress by 42%, ultimate load by 37%, and energy absorption by 74%, whereas reducing thickness to 250 mm caused reductions of 83%, 61%, and 90%, respectively. Enhancing concrete strength to 60 MPa increased central stress by 152%, ultimate load by 149%, and energy absorption by 367%. The findings highlight the critical role of footing stiffness, cracking, and soil-structure interaction, demonstrating the limitations of uniform stress assumptions and providing practical guidance for safe, efficient, and economical design of RC footings on granular soils.

Indexed as

Cohesionless soilContact stress distributionFootingsNumerical analysisShallow foundationsSoil–structure interaction

Identifiers

PMID42252310
PMCPMC13365515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.