Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42252205›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of laboratory hematology2026

Impact of Somatic Mutations on Treatment Response and Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Shruti Mishra, Kailash Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Ashwin Kamak, Lovely Singh, Nilesh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shruti MishraBone Marrow Transplantation and Stem Cell Research Centre, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-3064
Kailash KumarDepartment of General Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Dinesh KumarDepartment of General Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Ashwin KamakDepartment of General Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Lovely SinghDepartment of General Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Nilesh KumarDepartment of General Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Funding

Banaras Hindu University R/Dev/D/IoE/Seed Grant-II/2021-22/40018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); yet, diverse molecular responses and resistance persist. BCR::ABL1 kinase-domain (TKD) mutations constitute just a fraction of this resistance, and the impact of additional somatic mutations on disease progression and early molecular response remains incompletely defined.

methodsThis single-centre cohort study analyzed 109 NGS-tested patients with CML, comprising 44 with TKI-resistant disease and 65 newly diagnosed patients. Targeted next-generation sequencing using a 135-gene myeloid panel was performed on 109 patients. An additional pilot subgroup of 30 TKI-resistant patients underwent BCR::ABL1 kinase-domain analysis by PCR/Sanger sequencing and was analyzed separately. Molecular response was assessed using BCR::ABL1 transcript levels on the International Scale and interpreted according to ELN 2020 recommendations.

resultsSomatic mutations were identified in 52.3% of TKI-resistant and 29.2% of newly diagnosed patients. All Cohort 1 blast-crisis patients were mutation-positive, and several concurrent abnormalities were more common in Cohort 1 than in Cohort 2, indicating clonal complexity. In Cohort 2, MMR was achieved in 28/39 (71.8%) mutation-negative and 6/13 (46.2%) mutation-positive patients. Mutation-positivity at baseline was associated with reduced MMR chances but not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.09-1.23; p = 0.099). ASXL1 emerged as the most common non-ABL1 mutation but was not statistically significant.

conclusionsIn this Indian CML cohort, somatic mutations were prevalent in TKI-resistant disease, linked to advanced phase and clonal complexity, and demonstrated a non-significant trend toward lower early MMR at diagnosis, highlighting the importance of genomic testing in this context.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMutationAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeFusion Proteins, bcr-ablProtein Kinase InhibitorsASXL1BCR::ABL1chronic myeloid leukemianext‐generation sequencingsomatic mutationstyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance

Identifiers

PMID42252205
PMCPMC13555106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.