Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42252089›Full record

SynthesisHemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis2026

Clinical Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xiaodong Wanyan, Jiayun Xu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaodong WanyanDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Jiayun XuDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4945-1211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis of clinical randomized controlled studies related to vitamin D supplements for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), to evaluate the clinical efficacy of vitamin D supplements for CKD patients complicated with anemia.

methodsA literature review of the published literature in both English and Chinese was searched from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang Data that were published from the inception date to January 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) eligible for the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. The quality of eligible studies was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.3 software.

resultsA total of 12 RCTs comprising 779 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 383 patients in the experimental group (with vitamin D supplementation) and 396 patients in the control group (without vitamin D supplementation). Meta-analysis showed that vitamin D supplements could significantly increase the hemoglobin (p < 0.01, SMD = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.45) and lower the dosage of erythropoietin required (p < 0.01, SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.43).

conclusionUse of vitamin D supplements can significantly elevate the hemoglobin concentration and reduce the dosage of erythropoietin. However, these findings remain to be validated by large-scale, multi-center, prospective RCTs.

Indexed as

AnemiaDietary SupplementsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicVitamin DFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeVitamin Danemiachronic kidney diseasemeta‐analysisvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID42252089
PMCPMC13350291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.