ArticleBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
Continuous erector spinae plane block for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer: a dual-center retrospective propensity-score weighted cohort study.
Article in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative analgesia remains challenging in thoracic surgery, particularly with the rise of Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (RATS). The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a promising opioid-sparing technique, but its role in RATS is unclear.
methodsIn this retrospective dual-center cohort study, we included 78 patients with lung cancer undergoing RATS, who received general anesthesia with or without ESPB. ESPB involved a single shot of 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine injection at T7, followed by a 24-hour infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (7 mL.h⁻¹). The primary outcome was opioid rescue within 36 hours. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and chest tube duration. Confounders were balanced with Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW).
resultsIn unadjusted analyses, there was no significant difference in rescue opioid consumption between groups (ESPB 37.8% vs. GA 27.3%; p = 0.46). After propensity score weighting to improve covariate balance, ESPB use was associated with lower postoperative opioid requirements (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.32-0.79; p = 0.01). This finding may reflect improved adjustment for measured confounders, although residual confounding cannot be excluded. In contrast, chest tube presence within 24 hours was associated with higher opioid requirements (OR = 2.32; 95% CI 1.22-4.20; p = 0.04). ESPB patients also required fewer scheduled opioids during the first 24-36h postoperatively (p = 0.03).
conclusionIn this observational cohort, ESPB use was associated with lower postoperative opioid requirements in RATS. These findings suggest a potential role for ESPB within ERAS pathways, although randomized studies are needed to confirm efficacy and define its role in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.