ReviewJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2026
IASLC Update on Classification of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Review in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct Molecular Pathways Driving Thymic and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Organ of Origin Defines Molecular Identity and Yields CD44 as a Marker of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumors (Lung Carcinoids): Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deep molecular profiling of lung neuroendocrine tumours and supra-carcinoids.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Redefining the Role of Chemotherapy and Targeted Cytotoxic Delivery in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors.Thoracic cancer · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of molecular profiling in rare lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the publication of the 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumors, our knowledge of pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has expanded significantly, particularly through the elucidation of molecular pathways and proposals to refine histopathologic classification. This expanded knowledge across all aspects of pulmonary NENs holds promise for more precise stratification of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and the potential development of novel, subtype-specific therapeutic strategies for all NENs. Based on our comprehensive review of the current pulmonary NEN landscape, our multidisciplinary expert panel has deliberated on the modification and updating of the 2021 classification, resulting in the proposal of a new pulmonary carcinoid/NET classification presented in this position paper, which incorporates the following three major points: (1) The proposed framework continues the shift from the traditional carcinoid terminology toward broader adoption of the "NET" nomenclature as found in other organ systems while retaining the term "carcinoid" as the primary diagnostic term to ensure clear communication with thoracic clinical providers. (2) Ki-67 has been incorporated as a diagnostic criterion, aligning with practices in other NET classifications. (3) There is formal recognition of the concept of "carcinoid/NET G3," a rare subset of lung carcinoids characterized by increased proliferative activity but with molecular features more aligned with pulmonary NETs than with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. This position paper on the current knowledge of pulmonary NENs, including the proposed carcinoid/NET classification, will aid in accurate tumor categorization and guide treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.