ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Language network functional connectivity in infancy predicts developmental language trajectories.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional brain connectivity from the fetal period through infancy: A narrative review of resting-state fMRI studies.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although developmental language delays affect approximately 10% of children in the general population, the neurodevelopmental mechanisms that support normative language acquisition, and atypicalities that may predict later language delay, across the first year of life are poorly understood. Here, resting-state fMRI data from the Baby Connectome Project was used to first evaluate age-related changes in language network functional connectivity and alterations associated with suboptimal language development. Additionally, a data-driven machine learning algorithm was used to partition our sample into three groups who showed Typical, Advanced, or Lagging trajectories of language development. These groups reliably differed on several assessments of language ability during infancy and toddlerhood. Using a priori brain regions involved in adult language processing, a seed-based functional connectivity analysis showed broad age-related increases in functional synchrony and specialization throughout the infant language network. Additionally, the Lagging group showed several distinct patterns of functional connectivity with language regions. Importantly, the magnitude of connectivity differences consistently predicted later language scores at two-year outcome across several different language assessments. These findings add to our understanding of normative neurodevelopmental patterns underlying language acquisition, and identify several potential biomarkers associated with language heterogeneity that could serve as future targets to inform diagnoses and clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.