Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251753›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2026

The roadmap for community engagement: co-design and evaluation of a toolkit to strengthen community-academic research partnerships.

Emily M D'Agostino, Christoph P Hornik, Isa Granados, Janet Kasper, Al Richmond, Allyn Daman, Princess Abbot-Grimes, Camille Brown-Lowery, Jeannine Sato, Tatiana Vizcaíno and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Emily M D'AgostinoDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Christoph P HornikDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Isa GranadosDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2789-2040
Janet KasperUnited Way of Merced County, 547 W Main St, Merced, CA 95340, USA.
Al RichmondCommunity-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH), PO Box 12124, Raleigh, NC 27605, USA.
Allyn DamanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Princess Abbot-GrimesDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Camille Brown-LoweryDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Jeannine SatoDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Tatiana VizcaínoUnited Way of Merced County, 547 W Main St, Merced, CA 95340, USA.
Claudia CorchadoCultiva Central Valley, 3341 M St, Merced, CA 95348, USA.
Mildred CouncilPitt County All-Stars 4-H Club, 403 Government Circle, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Minerva FreemanPitt County Development Corporation, Inc, 3725 NC Highway 222, Fountain, NC 27829, USA.
Camille GriggsBethel Advocacy Center, 2197 Old River Road, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Ann F HugginsPitt County Board of Public Health, 201 Government Circle, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Wes GrayPitt County Health Department, 201 Government Cir, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Amanda SparlingPitt County Health Department, 201 Government Cir, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Allison SwartPitt County Health Department, 201 Government Cir, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
Cody D NeshterukDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Roadmap for Community Engagement (Roadmap) is a publicly online available resource co-designed with community partners that aims to support effective research engagement. The Roadmap is designed to be accessible and useful to a wide range of community members, public health practitioners, researchers, and community health advocates. The current study aimed to assess the Roadmap's perceived usefulness, relevance, and potential for implementation.

methodsData were collected over 12 months using a mixed methods design. Partner surveys, focus groups, and field notes were collected from biweekly academic-community partner collaboration sessions, two Roadmap content-review cycles, and a 2-day evaluation event with community partners. Data were analyzed separately and combined using a concurrent narrative format.

resultsAmong 90 community partners, 94% reported the Roadmap was useful, 92% anticipated strengthened connections, and 89% agreed it addressed organizational needs. Qualitative themes highlighted accessibility, adaptability, and feasibility for sustaining partnerships as strengths of the Roadmap. Potential challenges included language access, limited infrastructure to implement the Roadmap, financial and time constraints.

conclusionsThe Roadmap is a rigorously co-developed, adaptable toolkit that can support equitable research partnerships. Findings justify formal effectiveness testing and implementation studies on scalability across settings to advance health equity.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity ParticipationAcademiaCooperative BehaviorFocus GroupsHumanscommunity-academic partnershipscommunity-based participatory researchcommunity-engaged research, health equitycommunity engagement

Identifiers

PMID42251753
PMCPMC13531720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.