Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251746›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026

From Root Cause Analysis to Systems Thinking: A Comparative Content Analysis of Patient Safety Incident Investigation Reports in Mental Healthcare.

Alexander Challinor, Sahil Bhandari, Oladayo Bifarin, Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae, Panchu Xavier, Pooja Saini, Kathryn Berzins, Rajan Nathan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander ChallinorResearch and Development, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-0007
Sahil BhandariResearch and Development, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, UK.
Oladayo BifarinResearch and Development, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-2508
Esmaeil Khedmati MorasaeBusiness School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Panchu XavierResearch and Development, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, UK.
Pooja SainiSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, England, UK.
Kathryn BerzinsPerson Centred Complex Care, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, England, UK.
Rajan NathanPerson Centred Complex Care, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, England, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe National Health Service, UK, has recently implemented a new patient safety strategy, replacing root cause analysis (RCA) incident investigation with systems-based approaches. It is unknown if this change will optimise learning and improve care outcomes. AIMS

objectivesWe aimed to analyse safety recommendations/actions/improvements/solutions from comprehensive incident investigations by comparing those that adopted root cause analysis with systems-based approaches.

methodThe evaluation adopted a sequential multi methods design. Reports were extracted between January 2022 and January 2023. The quality of the incident investigation was graded using a validated tool (Learning Response Review and Improvement Tool). Investigation identified solution types were organised using qualitative content analysis, adopting inductive and deductive orientations. These were then classified into system factors and the effectiveness of the solution scored. Descriptive statistics were computed to investigate differences between incident investigation type.

resultsGrading the quality of reports demonstrated that the expectations set out within the change in safety strategy were mostly being realised in practice. A total of 135 solutions were extracted from systems-based and 57 from RCA reports, where the type of solutions identified were similar between each investigation approach. Organisational system factors were the most frequent for systems-based whilst task system-work factors were most frequent for RCA reports. For both investigation types, most of these solutions were deemed to fall in the least effective category: administrative controls.

conclusionThe evaluation provides important insights into how the shift to systems-based investigations are shaping the quality of investigations and the recommendations that aim to prevent a recurrence of harm. Changing from RCA to systems-based investigations led to more patient/carer/family involvement and systems-focussed solutions, however weaker administrative recommendations remained prominent. Policy, practice and research need to ensure that the change in conceptual thinking and investigative orientation also contributes to improvements in learning and the development of stronger controls or barriers that prevent harm.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPatient SafetyRisk ManagementRoot Cause AnalysisSystems AnalysisHumansMedical ErrorsState MedicineUnited Kingdomcomplexityincidentpsychiatryroot‐cause analysissafetysystem

Identifiers

PMID42251746
PMCPMC13242895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.