SynthesisClinical and experimental dental research2026
Effect of Fluorescent Adhesives on Visibility and Tooth Enamel Surface Properties After Debonding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically review and meta-analyze the impact of fluorescent versus conventional orthodontic adhesives on debonding efficiency, bond strength, and enamel integrity.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis, following the PRISMA guidelines, searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central (inception to November 2024) for studies comparing fluorescent versus conventional adhesives. Included were 19 studies (17 in vitro and 2 in vivo), with 11 meta-analyses for shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI), residual adhesive surface area, enamel damage index (EDI), and removal time using a random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed with CRIS, RoB 2, and ROBINS-I.
resultsOf 798 records, 19 were included. Fluorescent adhesives reduced residual adhesive area (MD -0.57 mm
conclusionFluorescent adhesives enhance debonding efficiency by reducing residual adhesive area and removal time in laboratory settings, without affecting bond strength. Enamel protection is operator-dependent. Due to the predominance of in vitro studies (17/19) and limited clinical data (only 2 in vivo studies, one with a single patient), firm clinical recommendations cannot be made. High heterogeneity and moderate risk of bias further limit the strength of the findings. Further standardized clinical trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.