ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2026
Data- and Theory-Guided Design of Dual-Role V-Doped RuO
Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing efficient acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts is crucial for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWE). By mining a dataset of 718 reported catalysts, we statistically identified that multi-metal Ru-based oxides significantly outperform monometallic counterparts (median overpotential: 210 vs. 283 mV). Guided by this insight, microkinetic modeling screened 20 metal dopants, pinpointing vanadium as a promising candidate. The synthesized V-doped RuO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.