SynthesisJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2026
Comparison of Bankart repair with remplissage and Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnterior shoulder instability is the most common type of shoulder instability. For cases with subcritical glenoid bone loss, both Bankart repair with remplissage (BR) and the Latarjet procedure are viable surgical options. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing BR and Latarjet procedure.
methodsThis review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) was used to characterize the methodological quality. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. The analyzed outcomes included postoperative Rowe score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, range of motion (ROM), return-to-sport (RTS) rate, RTS time, recurrence rate, revision rate, and complications. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of follow-up duration.
resultsOverall, 12 studies involving 1186 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that BR was associated with a significantly lower complication rate than the Latarjet procedure. No significant differences were observed in functional outcomes, ROM, recurrence, revision, RTS, or RTS time. Subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction between follow-up duration and outcomes, particularly for VAS and Rowe scores, with a trend toward better short-term results for BR and better longer-term results for Latarjet.
conclusionsBR and the Latarjet procedure provide comparable clinical outcomes for anterior shoulder instability, with BR demonstrating a significantly lower complication rate. Follow-up duration may influence VAS and Rowe outcomes, suggesting a potential temporal shift in treatment effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
trial registrationCRD42024582343.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.