ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
A tissue-informed deep learning-based method for positron range correction in preclinical [Formula: see text]Ga PET imaging.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePositron range (PR) limits spatial resolution and quantitative accuracy in PET imaging, particularly for high-energy positron-emitting radionuclides such as [Formula: see text]Ga. This study proposes a deep learning-based approach using 3D residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural networks (3D RED-CNNs), incorporating tissue-dependent anatomical information through a μ-map-dependent loss function. We propose a model trained from realistic simulations and, using the information in the initial PET and CT images, obtain positron range corrected images. We validated our model in both simulations and real acquisitions.
methodsThree different 3D RED-CNN architectures-Single-Channel, Two-Channel, and DualEncoder-were trained using simulated PET datasets and evaluated on both synthetic and real PET acquisitions from [Formula: see text]Ga-FH and [Formula: see text]Ga-PSMA-617 mouse studies. The performance of each model was compared to a standard Richardson-Lucy deconvolution (RL-PRC) approach using metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index (SSIM), contrast recovery (CR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).
resultsIn simulations, CNN-based methods achieved up to 19% improvement in SSIM and 13% reduction in MAE compared to RL-PRC. The Two-Channel model showed the highest CR and CNR values, recovering lung activity with 97% agreement to the ground truth, compared to 77% with RL-PRC. Noise remained stable for CNN models (∼5.9%), whereas RL-PRC increased noise by 5.8%. In preclinical acquisitions, the Two-Channel model achieved the highest CNR in different tissues, while maintaining the lowest noise level (9.6%). Although no ground truth was available for real data, analysis confirmed superior tumor delineation and reduced spillover artifacts with the Two-Channel model.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate the potential of CNN-based PRC for improving quantitative PET imaging, particularly for [Formula: see text]Ga. CNN-based methods, particularly the Two-Channel model, outperformed conventional deconvolution in both simulated and real data. Future work will focus on enhancing model generalization through domain adaptation and hybrid training strategies, as well as extending the method to other high-energy PET radionuclides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.