ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
[
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate radiomic features extracted from [ MATERIALS &
methodsThis retrospective study included 243 prostate cancer patients undergoing [
resultsAmong the models constructed with 40%, 45%, and 50% SUVmax thresholds, the PC45 model (PET/CT radiomics + clinical parameters) performed best. For predicting psISUP grade ≥ 4, its test set AUC reached 0.917 (95% CI: 0.828-0.985), with 0.800 sensitivity and 0.921 specificity. For EPE prediction, the test set AUC was 0.772(95% CI: 0.633-0.883), sensitivity 0.700 and specificity 0.727. It showed stable performance across PSAD subgroups and higher net clinical benefit.
conclusionThe [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.