ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Country-level determinants of healthcare access for refugee populations in a host country: a comparative case study.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the unprecedented global volume of forced migration, ensuring equitable access to healthcare for refugees has become a pressing global health priority. This comparative case study examined country-level determinants that influence healthcare access and social determinants of health among refugees in Australia, South Korea, and the United States.
methodsWe conducted a comparative case study to identify country-level factors influencing refugee healthcare access in Australia, South Korea, and the United States. Countries were selected to capture diversity in geographic context, immigration and integration policies, and healthcare system structures. Data sources included a comprehensive review of laws, policies, and peer-reviewed literature, as well as in-depth interviews with refugees, healthcare providers, resettlement agency staff, and legal professionals. We used framework analysis guided by a conceptual model, incorporating both deductive and inductive coding. This study focused on cross-case themes emerging from the synthesis of all data sources.
resultsFindings revealed that, while refugees in all three host countries generally view health services as superior to those in their countries of origin, significant disparities persisted in access across various factors. The availability of culturally and linguistically appropriate care, legal frameworks, insurance systems, and social supports varied widely, contributing to health disparities. In the United States, complex healthcare navigation and insurance gaps posed substantial barriers, while in South Korea, legal mandates for interpretation services were lacking, and health insurance coverage was limited for certain refugee groups. Australia's universal health coverage and government-funded language and interpretation services supported more inclusive access, although barriers existed for vulnerable subgroups.
conclusionsThis study underscores the significance of national policies, culturally competent care, and long-term integration support in promoting health equity for refugees. It also highlights the need for targeted, context-sensitive strategies to address persistent barriers and calls for better-tailored policies to support the health and well-being of refugees in host countries and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.