ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2026
Personalizing adjuvant radiotherapy decisions in breast cancer: an externally test MRI radiomics approach for recurrence risk stratification.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a radiomics signature based on preoperative MRI to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) and which patients will benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL
design771 eligible patients from two independent centers were collected. The training set (n = 504) obtained was from the Yunnan Cancer Hospital, and the external test set (n = 267) was obtained from the Duke Breast Cancer MRI Study. Pearson correlation analysis and clustering were used to construct the radiomics signature Rad-score. Based on the best cut-off value, the patients were divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group, and the prognostic value was evaluated. A combined model nomogram was developed based on the radiomics features incorporating independent clinicopathological risk factors. The combined model's performance was assessed regarding its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to identify patients who benefited from adjuvant radiotherapy.
resultsThe high-risk group was significantly associated with worse RFS in the training and test sets (p = 0.001 and 0.048). The combination model can accurately predict BC recurrence risk (AUC, 0.752; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.698-0.807). Additionally, adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with the outcome of high-risk patients (training and test sets: p = 0.665 and 0.903, respectively). In the low-risk group, adjuvant radiotherapy was significantly associated with RFS (training and test sets: p = 0.004 and P<0.001).
conclusionsThe Rad-score can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with breast cancer, and identify high-risk patients who do not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.