ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Effects of cerebral infarction on cognitive and speech performance.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present study sought to identify the cognitive features and speech features that might distinguish cerebral infarction patients by using artificial intelligence.
methodsA total of 117 patients were divided into the lacunar group, non-lacunar cerebral infarction group, and control group from Anhui No.2 Provincial People's Hospital. The cognitive features were created from the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-B) and the speech features were created from the cookie theft picture description task.
resultsCerebral infarction patients, including lacunar and non-lacunar groups, had lower cognitive scores than the control group, with the non-lacunar group performing more poorly. The fluency task showed significant differences among the three groups, with the non-lacunar cerebral infarction group differing most from the control group. Non-lacunar and lacunar cerebral infarction groups performed worse than the control group in memory tasks, with the non-lacunar infarction group performing more poorly. Artificial intelligence technology was used to analyze speech data from patients completing tasks, revealing differences in acoustic features between the non-lacunar and lacunar cerebral infarction groups.
conclusionCognitive performance is a important distinguishing features of cerebral infarction. Some acoustic features may play an important role in distinguishing lacunar infarction from non-lacunar infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.