Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251348›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Body composition changes in the postpartum: a systematic review on measurements and predictors.

Malith Kumarasinghe, Andrew P Hills, Kiran Dk Ahuja

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Malith Kumarasinghe *School of Health Sciences, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania (UTAS), The Shed, 80, Cimitiere Street, Inveresk, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-8623
Andrew P Hills *School of Health Sciences, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania (UTAS), The Shed, 80, Cimitiere Street, Inveresk, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-7201
Kiran Dk AhujaSchool of Health Sciences, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania (UTAS), The Shed, 80, Cimitiere Street, Inveresk, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia. kiran.ahuja@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0323-4692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis systematic review investigated changes in maternal body composition and specific anthropometric indices during the postpartum period, and the factors influencing these changes.

methodsLongitudinal observational studies with at least two measurements of postpartum maternal body composition and anthropometry were included. Studies that assessed only BMI or included a single postpartum measurement without a corresponding preconception measure were excluded. Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched for studies published up to 30th September 2025. Conference proceedings or studies not published in English were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Assessing risk of bias and confounding in observational studies of interventions or exposures tool from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Data on the changes in body composition and associated factors were summarised and presented in graphical and tabular formats. The review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

resultsOf 1,273 abstracts screened, 86 studies were retained for data extraction. Sixty-one studies assessed changes in body composition and anthropometry, while 44 studies examined the association between various factors and body composition outcomes. Overall, 73 body composition and anthropometric indices were reported, with fat mass ratio/percentage being the most frequently used measure. Waist circumference showed a substantial reduction during the first month of the postpartum. The timing of initial measurements, length of follow-up, and techniques varied widely; 59% of studies concluded follow-up at or before 9 months postpartum. Techniques used to assess body composition ranged from skinfold thickness and circumference measurements to bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

conclusionsThis systematic review underscores the complexity and variability of postpartum body composition changes. Given the association between postpartum adiposity and adverse long-term maternal health outcomes, integrating body composition and anthropometric assessments alongside BMI is essential. Extending follow-up beyond one year postpartum may further improve understanding and management of postpartum adiposity in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Body CompositionPostpartum PeriodAnthropometryBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyWaist CircumferenceBody compositionFactorsPostpartumSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42251348
PMCPMC13459293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.