ArticleBMC surgery2026
Early outcomes of transverse perineal support in obstructed defecation syndrome with pathological perineal descent; a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile current surgical approaches for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) primarily target rectocele and rectal intussusception, excessive perineal descent (PD) may contribute to persistent symptoms and suboptimal surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate early outcomes of transverse perineal support (TPS), a procedure designed to reinforce the perineum, in patients with ODS and pathological PD. PATIENTS AND
methodAll consecutive patients with ODS and pathological PD were assessed for eligibility. After at least one year of conservative management (dietary fiber, biofeedback, laxatives) that failed to relieve symptoms, twenty-nine patients were evaluated preoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), perineometry, anorectal manometry, and MRI defecography. All patients underwent TPS procedure and were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in CCCS at 6 months.
resultsSignificant postoperative improvements were observed. The CCCS decreased significantly, with a mean difference (Post - Pre) of -5.31 (95% CI: -6.13 to -4.48 ; p < 0.001). Postoperative PISQ-12 scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores, with median (IQR) values of 35 (34-36) and 25 (24-27), respectively (p = 0.003). Intrarectal pressure during push increased from 34.34 ± 6.03 mmHg preoperatively to 41.17 ± 5.85 mmHg postoperatively with a mean difference (Post - Pre) of 6.83 (95% CI: 5.41 to 8.24; p < 0.001). Perineal descent measured by perineometry decreased from 2.29 ± 0.55 cm preoperatively to 1.74 ± 0.51 cm postoperatively with a mean difference of -0.64 cm (95% CI: -0.75 to -0.52; p < 0.001). No mesh-related complications (erosion, chronic pain) were observed. Nine patients (31.03%) reported persistent symptoms. All had rectal intussusception. Compared with patients who improved, these patients were older, had smaller perineal bodies, and greater preoperative perineal descent.
conclusionsTransverse perineal support procedure may be an effective option for selected patients with ODS and pathological PD. Outcomes were less favorable in patients with rectal intussusception, older age (observed as an association only, not causation) or smaller perineal body dimensions, underscoring the importance of careful patient selection and individualized surgical planning. Given the small sample size and the absence of a control group, these findings should be interpreted with caution as associational rather than causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.