Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251333›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2026

Leveraging lived experience: a qualitative study on the impact of formerly incarcerated consultants in public policy making to improve safety net services.

Jazmin Candelario, Diana Zúñiga, Diamond Lee, Califia Abwoon, Sandy Arevalo, María Casillas Gonzalez, Jason Garcia, Sergio Garcia, Lami Glenn, Gilbert Johnson and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jazmin CandelarioMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Diana ZúñigaReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Diamond LeeReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Califia AbwoonReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sandy ArevaloReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
María Casillas GonzalezReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jason GarciaReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sergio GarciaReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lami GlennReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gilbert JohnsonReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jack MorrisReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tue HuynhReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yusef WileyReentry Health Advisory Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Arleen F BrownDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 1100 Glendon Ave, Suite 1100, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA.
Savanna L CarsonDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 1100 Glendon Ave, Suite 1100, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA. scarson@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001881NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UL1TR001881Robert Wood Johnson Foundation #815544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLos Angeles County-wide criminal justice reform and policy decision-making focused on reentry and diversion from incarceration usually include only the voices of law enforcement and other public-sector employees, with little input from impacted community members. The Reentry Health Advisory Collaborative (RHAC), founded in 2020 with grant funding, was established to engage formerly incarcerated individuals and their communities in county safety-net health systems. We aimed to assess the impact of RHAC and the importance of formerly incarcerated community input in safety-net programs and policymaking.

methodsIn 2022, following 3 years of RHAC implementation, online qualitative surveys were conducted with RHAC members and reentry service collaborators, including agency staff, nonprofits, and policymakers, to understand RHAC's influence and how lived experiences inform justice and health systems.

resultsThirty replies from collaborators (59%) and eight from members (100%) resulted in thematic findings that highlighted benefits of involving formerly incarcerated persons in program and policy decisions-such as their firsthand experiences, focus on root causes, and community and socioeconomic tailoring approaches-and challenges like limited political power, varying receptiveness to ideas and inclusion, and a lack of sustainable funding. Members shared outcomes like motivation, peer support, leadership skills, and advocacy training needs. Recommendations for future inclusion emphasized promoting awareness and strategies for relationships with public-serving institutions, early inclusion for impacting pivotal decision-making, and continued engagement with the community through on-the-ground grassroots efforts. Barriers to reentry included basic needs, access issues, lack of support, and discrimination.

conclusionsCompensating lived experience in health and justice services promotes inclusive, equitable policies that reflect community needs.

Indexed as

ConsultantsPolicy MakingPrisonersPublic PolicySafety-net ProvidersHumansLos AngelesQualitative ResearchCo-designCommunity reentryCriminal lawIncarcerationLived experienceParticipatory governancePost-release supportSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID42251333
PMCPMC13464329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.