ArticleHarm reduction journal2026
Leveraging lived experience: a qualitative study on the impact of formerly incarcerated consultants in public policy making to improve safety net services.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLos Angeles County-wide criminal justice reform and policy decision-making focused on reentry and diversion from incarceration usually include only the voices of law enforcement and other public-sector employees, with little input from impacted community members. The Reentry Health Advisory Collaborative (RHAC), founded in 2020 with grant funding, was established to engage formerly incarcerated individuals and their communities in county safety-net health systems. We aimed to assess the impact of RHAC and the importance of formerly incarcerated community input in safety-net programs and policymaking.
methodsIn 2022, following 3 years of RHAC implementation, online qualitative surveys were conducted with RHAC members and reentry service collaborators, including agency staff, nonprofits, and policymakers, to understand RHAC's influence and how lived experiences inform justice and health systems.
resultsThirty replies from collaborators (59%) and eight from members (100%) resulted in thematic findings that highlighted benefits of involving formerly incarcerated persons in program and policy decisions-such as their firsthand experiences, focus on root causes, and community and socioeconomic tailoring approaches-and challenges like limited political power, varying receptiveness to ideas and inclusion, and a lack of sustainable funding. Members shared outcomes like motivation, peer support, leadership skills, and advocacy training needs. Recommendations for future inclusion emphasized promoting awareness and strategies for relationships with public-serving institutions, early inclusion for impacting pivotal decision-making, and continued engagement with the community through on-the-ground grassroots efforts. Barriers to reentry included basic needs, access issues, lack of support, and discrimination.
conclusionsCompensating lived experience in health and justice services promotes inclusive, equitable policies that reflect community needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.