ArticleBMC health services research2026
Implementing inclusive online psychological support after stroke: professional stakeholder views from a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmotional difficulties post-stroke are common, particularly among people from minoritised ethnic communities or with aphasia, an acquired communication disorder. However, there is a shortage of supportive evidence-based interventions, and of clinical psychologists to deliver them at scale. Wellbeing After Stroke-2 (WAterS-2) is a novel, online, group psychotherapy intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. It was designed to support post-stroke psychological adjustment, delivered by a trained non-psychologist workforce to increase potential reach. To guide equitable implementation of such interventions into routine stroke care, this study explored barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of key stakeholders: healthcare commissioners, managers, and frontline clinicians.
methodsQualitative, semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted online with purposively recruited healthcare professionals involved in commissioning, managing, or delivering stroke care in England. The qualitative interview schedule was informed by both the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), while the subsequent thematic template analysis was primarily guided by CFIR to explore contextual factors and practical strategies for equitable implementation.
resultsFourteen interviews were conducted (Feb-April 2024), with commissioning managers (n = 8), service managers (n = 4), and clinicians (n = 2). Analyses suggested three themes around the barriers and facilitators likely to influence equitable implementation: (1) Quality of Care vs. Quality of Cash Flow - highlighting a tension between tailoring for inclusion and demonstrating clinical- and cost-effectiveness; (2) Time & Leadership - highlighting a need for leadership to prioritise time investment in equity efforts; (3) Postcode Lottery - highlighting existing variation in local infrastructure, with third-sector partnerships suggested as key enablers.
conclusionEquitable implementation of online psychological support requires balancing the diverse needs of stroke survivors and the constraints of a publicly funded healthcare system. Recommended actions to enable equity provide useful insights for the development, implementation and commissioning of online mental health interventions for stroke survivors. Strategies such as embedding interventions within existing workflows, securing leadership support, and forming partnerships with community organisations may help translate online support like WAterS-2 into routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.