Trial reportBMC surgery2026
Non-operative versus operative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study in Sierra Leone.
Trial report in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis is the leading cause of acute abdomen in young adults, typically managed by appendectomy. A growing body of evidence supports non-operative management as an alternative for uncomplicated cases. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of non-operative management (NOM) versus operative management (OM) for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
methodsA prospective, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Connaught Hospital, Sierra Leone. Sixty patients were randomized: 30 to NOM and 30 to OM. NOM patients received intravenous metronidazole and ceftriaxone for 48 h, followed by oral metronidazole and ciprofloxacin for 5 days. OM patients underwent open appendectomy. NOM patients were monitored for symptom resolution or progression; failure required appendectomy. Both groups were followed up on days 7, 10, 30, 60, and 90 post-admissions to assess recurrence, cost of care, and quality of life (QoL).
resultsThe median age was 26 years (IQR 14-42) for NOM and 27 years (IQR 18-54) for OM. Most patients were males (NOM: 66.7%, OM: 63.3%). Antibiotic treatment was successful in 18 (60%) NOM patients. Failure occurred in 12 (40%) NOM patients, 11 during the index admission, with 1 (3.3%) experiencing recurrence within a week of discharge. Successful NOM resulted in a significantly improved QoL score (5.98), a shorter mean hospital stays (4 days), a lower mean cost of care (NLe 482.29; $49.08), and no catastrophic health expenditure, compared to both OM and failed NOM. Statistically significant differences were observed in favor of successful NOM over surgery (including OM and failed NOM requiring surgery) for the cost of care and time to return to normal activities.
conclusionNOM for uncomplicated acute appendicitis achieved a 60% success rate with a low recurrence rate (3.3%). It is associated with lower costs, reduced risk of catastrophic health expenditure, shorter hospital stays, faster return to normal activities, and improved QoL compared to operative management.
trial registrationThe Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: PACTR202605655002550. Date of registration:20
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.