Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251268›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Genomics as a time capsule: insights from Oreobates chiquitanus type specimens.

Yannis Schöneberg, Marcel Nebenführ, Martin Jansen, Axel Janke, Sven Winter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yannis Schöneberg *Institute for Ecology, Evolution, and Diversity, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. yannis.schoeneberg@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1113-973X
Marcel Nebenführ *Institute for Ecology, Evolution, and Diversity, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8802-2105
Martin JansenDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Senckenberg Research Institute and Nature Museum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-4601
Axel JankeInstitute for Ecology, Evolution, and Diversity, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-1904
Sven WinterInstitute for Ecology, Evolution, and Diversity, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. sven.winter@senckenberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-0977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiodiversity is at increasing risk, and amphibians are the most threatened vertebrate class, with 40.7% of species globally at risk. For amphibians, the primary cause for their decline is habitat loss. The scale of this global issue becomes most evident in so-called deforestation hotspots, such as the Chiquitano Dry Forest in Bolivia, which harbours a highly diverse fauna and flora with many species still awaiting formal description. Only recently, the frog Oreobates chiquitanus has been described from a single location within this forest. Since then, it was discovered at only two additional sites. An ongoing logging initiative at the type locality led to the deforestation of the sampling site, even before the species was formally described. Ongoing logging activities in the vicinity of all known sites raise questions about the species' fate. Here, we provide a comprehensive genetic definition of the species and try to assess the genetic diversity and conservation value of the type population.

resultsWe sequenced all available type specimens of Oreobates chiquitanus, providing a reference genome from one of the paratopotypes and mitochondrial assemblies for all type specimens. We further show that all known populations of this species are near recent logging initiatives. The reconstruction of the demographic history indicates that the population was recovering from a dip roughly 300kya. The estimates of relatedness and heterozygosity imply a genetically vital population.

conclusionsThis study exemplifies the importance of collaboration of natural history collections and genomic initiatives like TBG (Translational Biodiversity Genomics) for a better understanding of the anthropogenic impacts in times of global change, to identify and describe biodiversity, to raise awareness, and inform potential conservation measures. We not only provide a comprehensive and permanent molecular definition for O. chiquitanus but also assess the genetic diversity of the population. Therefore, this study provides an important baseline for future studies of genetic erosion in this species. Furthermore, it illustrates the risk of biodiversity loss in the Chiquitano Dry Forest and signifies the need for conservation efforts.

Indexed as

GenomicsRanidaeAnimalsBiodiversityBoliviaConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationPhylogenyAnuraConservationDeforestationGenomeGlobal Change BiologyHolotype SequencingInbreedingMuseomicsNeotropicsPopulation

Identifiers

PMID42251268
PMCPMC13242125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.