Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251215›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2026

Predicting accuracy in eyewitness showups: confidence and response time in the laboratory, confidence in the field.

Laura Mickes, Karen L Amendola, Xueqing Chen, Maria Valdovinos Olson, Curt A Carlson, Scott Gronlund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura MickesUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK. laura.mickes@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-9753
Karen L AmendolaNational Policing Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-5236
Xueqing ChenUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-0261
Maria Valdovinos OlsonNational Policing Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-7296
Curt A CarlsonEast Texas A & M University, Commerce, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6469-8634
Scott GronlundThe University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-7773

Funding

National Institute of Justice 2019-75-CX-0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Police administer live showup procedures when a suspect is located shortly after a crime, yet most prior research has relied on static, image-based showups, where confidence is often a weaker predictor of accuracy than in lineup procedures. Because actual police showup procedures involve live, in-person identifications, we conducted two studies to test the reliability of eyewitness confidence in live showups. In Study 1, a laboratory experiment (N = 229), identifications made with both high confidence and fast response time were more likely to be correct, and high-confidence rejections indicated suspect innocence. In Study 2 (N = 153), a field study using showup cases from two US jurisdictions, eyewitness confidence again indicated accuracy, assessed with the Strength of Evidence Scale as a proxy for ground truth. These findings demonstrate that eyewitness confidence is an indicator of accuracy in live showups, with implications for law enforcement policy and safeguards against wrongful convictions. When administered with procedures to reduce bias, live showups can yield reliable and probative identification, supporting their continued use in police investigations.

Indexed as

Identity RecognitionMental RecallMetacognitionReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultConfidence–accuracyConfrontationEvidentiary strengthEyewitness identificationField identificationsReflector variablesResponse timeShowups

Identifiers

PMID42251215
PMCPMC13461980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.