ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Survival Outcomes in Early Onset Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma (EOAA).
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of early onset (age < 50 years at diagnosis) appendiceal adenocarcinoma (EOAA) is rising alarmingly. Reported data on etiology, treatment, and outcomes is scarce. In this study, we report clinical outcomes for patients with EOAA. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients diagnosed with appendiceal adenocarcinoma between 2013 and 24 were stratified on the basis of age at diagnosis as having either EOAA (< 50 years) or average-age onset appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AOAA; ≥ 50 years). Clinicopathological and genomic data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Baseline clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes were compared between patients with EOAA and AOAA.
resultsOf 181 eligible patients, 49 (27.1%) had EOAA. Median age at diagnosis for patients with EOAA was 42.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 35.7-46). Of the 76 patients (EOAA = 23 [30.3%] + AOAA = 53 (69.7%)] who had locoregional disease at presentation, 44 (57.9%) remained disease-free for at least 2 years. Within these 44 (conditional survival), the EOAA group showed numerically shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) and higher risk of recurrence (median RFS, EOAA = 49.5 months versus AOAA = 83.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 4.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-11.18; p = 0.06). Long-term recurrences (≥ 5 years) were seen in 9/15 (60%) patients during the 5-year follow-up period. Of 139 evaluable patients (EOAA = 36 [25.9%] + AOAA = 103 [74.1%]) with metastatic/recurrent disease, patients with EOAA received more non-fluorouracil (FU)-based systemic treatments, including experimental agents, in any line of treatment (8/36, 22.2% versus 6/103, 5.8%; p = 0.009). A higher proportion of patients in the EOAA group received bevacizumab in any line of treatment (24/36, 66.7% versus 49/103, 47.6%; p = 0.055) and three or more lines of systemic therapy (10/36, 27.8% versus 14/103, 13.6%; p = 0.07). There was no significant difference in OS between the EOAA and AOAA groups despite more aggressive therapy in EOAA (median OS, EOAA = 35.2 months versus AOAA = 40.6 months; HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.57-1.44; p = 0.66).
conclusionsAmong patients who remained disease-free after initial surgical resection for locoregional disease for at least 2 years, recurrence was more frequent in patients with EOAA. Aggressive systemic therapy, including trials and non-FU based therapies were more frequent in patients with EOAA but were not associated with improved survival. EOAA may represent a unique entity within this rare disease, which warrants further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.