Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251182›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Occupational predictors of serum per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations in a national biomonitoring survey of adults in Canada.

Ryann E Yeo, Patrick Hinton, Katherine Pullella, Joanne Kim, Daniel R S Middleton, Victoria Arrandale, Nathan L DeBono

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryann E YeoOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Ontario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. ryann.yeo@mail.utoronto.ca.
Patrick HintonOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Ontario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Katherine PullellaDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joanne KimEnvironment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Daniel R S MiddletonCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. d.middleton@qub.ac.uk.
Victoria ArrandaleDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nathan L DeBonoOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Ontario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of chemicals widely used in industrial applications and consumer products, which have been associated with negative health outcomes, including cancer. Comprehensive identification of highly exposed occupations is needed.

objectiveWe aim to examine serum PFAS concentrations across occupation and industry of employment and other exposure determinants in a national sample of adults in the cross-sectional Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS).

methodsSerum concentrations of six PFAS compounds (perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA], perfluorooctane sulfonate [PFOS], perfluorohexane sulfonate [PFHxS], perfluorononanoic acid [PFNA], perfluorodecanoic acid [PFDA], and perfluoroundecanoic acid [PFUnA]) were measured in a total of 5956 participants (ages 20-79 years) from four cycles of the CHMS (2007-2019). Multivariable linear regression models were used to predict geometric means (GM), adjusted for demographic, dietary, and environmental determinants. Adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each exposure determinant vs. its reference group, and each of the 152 occupation or industry groups vs. all other participants, were estimated overall and by sex.

resultsPFAS concentrations declined substantially over time and were elevated among participants who were older, male, or East/Southeast Asian. GMRs for various PFAS were elevated in healthcare, assembly manufacturing, and agriculture occupations. Overall, laborers in manufacturing had 21-25% higher GM serum concentrations of PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS, while those employed in the clothing manufacturing industry had two-fold higher PFOS (GMR = 2.39, 95%CI: 1.53-3.73) and PFHxS (2.12, 1.18-3.82). Females in front-line public protection had elevated PFOA (1.56, 0.99-2.46), and females in industrial, electrical and construction trades had 87% higher PFHxS. SIGNIFICANCE: PFAS exposure was elevated in several occupations and industries with known or plausible sources of occupational exposure, with some important differences by sex. Further targeted assessment is needed to identify and mitigate exposure in highly exposed groups. IMPACT STATEMENT: This Canadian cohort analysis advances the understanding of occupational exposure to PFAS by identifying several novel occupational groups with validated elevated serum PFAS concentrations, including healthcare; construction trades; laborers and assemblers in manufacturing; clothing manufacturing; and electrical manufacturing, alongside more established groups such as chemical manufacturing and front-line protection. Among females, a historically understudied group, elevated levels were observed among front-line protection; construction trades; manufacturing supervisors and operators; and specialty trade contractors. To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study to investigate sex-stratified PFAS biomarker concentrations among adults employed in a wide range of occupations and industries.

Indexed as

Canadian Health Measures SurveyHuman biomonitoringOccupational exposurePer- and polyfluoroalkyl substancesSex differences

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.