ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Discovery of BEND4 as a novel single-gene prognostic marker and therapeutic target for adverse AML.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presents significant clinical challenges due to patient heterogeneity and variable treatment responses. Cytogenetic and mutation-based biomarkers dominate current prognostic classifications. However, many patients lack these canonical markers, and most are not therapeutic targets. Gene expression-based biomarkers, despite their clinical potential, remain underexplored. Here, we used transcriptome analyses of primary AML cohorts (n = 1338) and identified BEN domain-containing protein 4 (BEND4) as significantly overexpressed in adverse cytogenetic risk. Independent validation (n = 350) showed BEND4 was significantly overexpressed in relapse and refractory AML patients. High BEND4 expression was associated with poor overall survival, increased relapse risk, and was an independent risk factor in AML. Furthermore, in prognostic prediction, BEND4 expression outperformed mutation or gene expression-based models and a Δct threshold from RT-qPCR of <12.75 differentiated adverse risk AML patients with 91% sensitivity and 81% specificity. Functionally, BEND4 perturbation modulated chemoresistance to doxorubicin and cytarabine, apoptosis, cell cycle distribution, cellular proliferation and clonogenicity, by altering several oncogenic and inflammation-related molecular pathways. In vivo, BEND4 overexpression promoted leukemogenesis and shortened survival, whereas its suppression decreased tumor burden and improved survival. This study establishes BEND4 as a clinically relevant single gene expression-based biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in AML.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.