Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251153›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning-based automated classification of endometrial lesions in IVF patients using hysteroscopic images.

Marah Barakat, Rasha Massoud, Marwan Alhalabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marah BarakatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic. marah123.barakat@damascusuniversity.edu.sy.
Rasha MassoudDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Marwan AlhalabiDivision of Reproductive Medicine, Embryology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial health is a key determinant of female fertility and successful pregnancy outcomes, making the accurate diagnosis of endometrial lesions essential for the success of assisted reproductive technology. While hysteroscopy remains the gold standard for uterine cavity evaluation, interpretation can vary based on clinical expertise. To address this, we developed a deep learning-based clinical decision support system to classify hysteroscopic images from high-resolution (4 K) videos into three categories: normal endometrium, endometrial polyps, and endometritis. Endometritis cases were classified based on hysteroscopic features suggestive of inflammation; no histopathological confirmation was obtained. Utilizing a dataset of 1500 expert-annotated images from 200 clinical videos, we applied transfer learning across four architectures: VGG-16, VGG-19, DenseNet-121, and EfficientNet-B0. Our results show that the models achieved classification accuracies between 85 and 89%, with DenseNet-121 demonstrating superior performance, specifically achieving a sensitivity of 93% and an AUC of 98.8% for polyp detection, alongside a precision of 90% for endometritis. Furthermore, Grad-CAM visualization confirmed that the networks focused on clinically relevant morphological features, enhancing model interpretability. These findings suggest that deep learning may serve as a supportive tool to assist clinicians in hysteroscopic analysis, pending validation on external datasets and with pathologically confirmed labels.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEndometritisEndometriumFertilization in VitroHysteroscopyPolypsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansEndometrial polypsEndometritisGrad-CAMHysteroscopyIn vitro fertilization (IVF)Transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID42251153
PMCPMC13482470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.