Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251137›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Human-AI co-design for clinical prediction models.

Jean Feng, Avni Kothari, Patrick Vossler, Andrew Bishara, Lucas Zier, Newton Addo, Aaron Kornblith, Yan Shuo Tan, Chandan Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jean Feng *University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. jean.feng@ucsf.edu.
Avni Kothari *University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Patrick VosslerUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew BisharaUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lucas ZierUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Newton AddoUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aaron KornblithUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yan Shuo TanNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Chandan SinghMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing safe, effective, and practically useful clinical prediction models (CPMs) traditionally requires extensive collaboration between clinical experts, data scientists, and informaticists to refine the many small but critical details of the model building process. When incorporating unstructured clinical notes, this challenge magnifies, as notes essentially contain an infinite number of concepts that can be used for modeling. We introduce HACHI, an iterative human-in-the-loop framework that uses AI agents to accelerate the development of fully interpretable CPMs from clinical notes, where CPMs are defined as linear models of yes-no questions. HACHI alternates between an AI agent that uses statistical tools and embedded knowledge to explore candidate concepts and domain experts who provide feedback to the AI agent. The framework optimizes for transparency, steerability, and reciprocal learning to ensure effective collaboration between the clinical AI team and the AI agent. In two real-world prediction tasks (acute kidney injury and traumatic brain injury), HACHI outperforms existing approaches, discovers clinically relevant concepts, and improves model generalizability across clinical sites and time periods. HACHI also highlights the critical role of human oversight, such as in directing the AI agent to explore new concept categories, adjusting concept granularity, and identifying data bias and leakage.

Identifiers

PMID42251137
PMCPMC13669369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.