ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Human-AI co-design for clinical prediction models.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing safe, effective, and practically useful clinical prediction models (CPMs) traditionally requires extensive collaboration between clinical experts, data scientists, and informaticists to refine the many small but critical details of the model building process. When incorporating unstructured clinical notes, this challenge magnifies, as notes essentially contain an infinite number of concepts that can be used for modeling. We introduce HACHI, an iterative human-in-the-loop framework that uses AI agents to accelerate the development of fully interpretable CPMs from clinical notes, where CPMs are defined as linear models of yes-no questions. HACHI alternates between an AI agent that uses statistical tools and embedded knowledge to explore candidate concepts and domain experts who provide feedback to the AI agent. The framework optimizes for transparency, steerability, and reciprocal learning to ensure effective collaboration between the clinical AI team and the AI agent. In two real-world prediction tasks (acute kidney injury and traumatic brain injury), HACHI outperforms existing approaches, discovers clinically relevant concepts, and improves model generalizability across clinical sites and time periods. HACHI also highlights the critical role of human oversight, such as in directing the AI agent to explore new concept categories, adjusting concept granularity, and identifying data bias and leakage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.