ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Prognostic data extraction harnessing a privacy-preserving large language model: a clinician-AI collaborative retrospective evaluation in head and neck oncology.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Privacy regulations and limited expert-validation constrain the deployment of large language models (LLMs) for electronic health record structuring. We evaluated locally deployed LLMs to extract 30 prognostic variables from 1,360 head and neck cancer reports (882 patients) using zero-shot prompting. A stratified 50-case subset was reviewed by three radiation oncologists (50 cases, 30 fields, 3 reviewers; 4,500 decisions) to form a majority-vote reference for Llama3.3-70B, which achieved 98.6% F1 with high clinician agreement and processed reports in 53 s/report. Among seven additional models (2.6B-70B) benchmarked against this reference, GPT-OSS-20.9B (F1 89.4%) and MedGemma-27B (F1 88.5%) performed best. Integrating LLM-extracted HPV status, smoking history, and Charlson Comorbidity Score into a multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards model (age, sex, T/N stage) improved disease-free survival (likelihood ratio test p = 0.014; ΔC-index + 0.071) and locoregional failure-free survival (p = 0.026; ΔC-index + 0.108) with 1,000-bootstrap internal validation. This clinician-AI collaborative evaluation shows that on-premises LLMs enable privacy-preserving and efficient tumour board support, longitudinal data curation, and outcome prediction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.