Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251104›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hunting by humans affects the navigation of two endangered mammals in Zimbabwe and Brazil.

Andrea Presotto, Malvern Karidozo, Priscila Suscke, Christian Ciattei, William Langbauer, Marguerite Madden, Noah Krach, Richard Fayrer-Hosken, Richard Byrne, Ferrell Osborn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea PresottoDepartment of Earth, Environment, and Planning, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA. presottoa24@ecu.edu.
Malvern KaridozoConnected Conservation Trust, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.
Priscila SusckeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Christian CiatteiOxford Brookes University, Primate Conservation, Oxford, UK.
William LangbauerConnected Conservation Trust, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.
Marguerite MaddenDepartment of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Noah KrachEnvironmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, VA, USA.
Richard Fayrer-HoskenDepartment of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Richard ByrneSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP, UK.
Ferrell OsbornConnected Conservation Trust, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.
Patrícia IzarDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 10/51252-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 10/51455-0National Science Foundation 1820971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities have significantly altered natural habitats, changing the behavior of many animals. As human encroachment on natural habitats increases, animals must adapt their behavior to couple with these rapid environmental changes. The landscape of fear (LOF) refers to prey perception of risk, which leads to behavioral adaptations throughout an animal's lifetime. Animals might choose habitats with lower potential energy intake and lower perceived risk over those with higher potential energy intake and higher perceived risk, thus trading off food quality for safety. Here, we investigate whether two endangered mammal species increase the frequency with which they use their travel routes as a navigation strategy to avoid human-influenced areas and traumatic-risk events. Thus, creating a habitual route system to avoid these events and human activities. Using GIS, primary movement data, and remote sensing, we demonstrated that two endangered species increase their use of habitual routes in landscapes where hunting by humans is present. This means using their LOF potentially to focus on signs of risky locations, and human activities, including hunting. These analytical approaches raise questions about whether some species opt for less demanding navigation strategies to balance their focus between navigation and monitoring for signals of risk.

Indexed as

ElephantsEndangered SpeciesHuntingSpatial NavigationAnimalsBrazilConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFearHumansPredatory BehaviorZimbabweAnimal navigationElephant cognitionEndangered speciesHuman pressure on mammalsPrimate cognition

Identifiers

PMID42251104
PMCPMC13482163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.