ArticleScientific reports2026
The normative measures for Chinese Reading Acuity Test (CRAT) in Cantonese-speaking children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Chinese Reading Acuity Test (CRAT), a version of the MNRead Acuity Chart adapted for traditional Chinese, has previously been developed. This study aimed to establish normative values of the CRAT among Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong primary school children. We recruited 188 Cantonese-speaking Chinese children from Grades 1 to 6 without developmental delays or reading difficulties. The CRAT includes three charts, each with 17 sentences in Chinese characters sized from 1.3 to - 0.3 logMAR. After a practice session with Chart 1, participants read Charts 2 and 3 aloud as fast as possible at 40 cm under normal room lighting, continuing until the print size was too small to be resolved. We recorded reading time and errors and calculated maximum reading speed (CMRS), critical print size (CCPS), and reading acuity (CRA) using a non-linear mixed-effects model. Average values from the results in Charts 2 and 3 were used. The study found significant associations between age and grade level with CMRS (r = 0.72, p ≤ 0.001) and CRA (r = -0.47, p < 0.001), indicating improvements in reading speed and acuity with increasing age and grade. Additionally, Chinese near visual acuity (CNVA) showed significant correlations with CMRS (r = -0.24, p = 0.001), CRA (r = 0.41, p < 0.001), and CCPS (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). Normative data were established for each grade level and age group. The findings revealed that as children grow and advance through school grades, their ability to read faster and discern smaller print sizes improves. The CRAT is a valuable tool for clinicians and educators to assess reading performance and identify potential reading difficulties among Cantonese-speaking children. The normative data from this study will serve as a benchmark for evaluating and supporting the enhancement of reading skills in Cantonese-speaking children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.