ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid CNN BiLSTM architecture for smart grid cyberattack detection using smart meter data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time cyber-attack intrusion detection faces serious challenges in the smart grid communications infrastructure, as intrusion tactics become more advanced. Traditional rule-driven detection methods are unable to adapt to diverse attack patterns in modern power networks. In this work, a supervised deep learning framework is developed, using a CNN for spatial feature extraction, a BiLSTM for temporal dependency modeling, and an Extra Trees ensemble classifier to produce robust decisions, to achieve real-time intrusion detection on high-frequency smart meter data. The CNN layer extracts hierarchical spatial features from 128-dimensional multi-modal meter measurements (e.g., voltage, current, frequency harmonics), and the BiLSTM component captures temporal dynamics by processing whole sequences of meter data in both forward and backward directions to capture attack-evolution patterns that unidirectional models miss. Attention mechanisms dynamically weight the relevance of temporal features and enhance both prediction accuracy and interpretability. The Extra Trees ensemble provides a robust, low-variance decision output as an alternative to a standard Softmax layer. The architecture addresses several challenges: class imbalance (2.49:1 ratio), high dimensionality and noisy sensor data from heterogeneous sources, the requirement for real-time (millisecond-level) inference, and the need for explainability. The model was evaluated on 72,073 labeled power-grid logs from the Mississippi State University Power Grid Testbed, including False Data Injection Attacks, denial-of-service, replay, and man-in-the-middle attacks versus normal operation. With stratified five-fold cross-validation, the model achieves accuracy of 92.17% (± 0.27%), precision of 90.58% (± 0.49%), recall of 81.24% (± 0.86%), F1-score of 85.66% (± 0.20%), and ROC-AUC of 95.60% (± 0.14%), with an inference latency of only 12 ms, which is suitable for utility-scale deployment. A comprehensive comparative study against nine imbalance-handling strategies (no handling, class weighting, SMOTE, ADASYN, Borderline-SMOTE, SMOTETomek, SMOTEENN, random over/under-sampling) confirms the chosen weighted-learning strategy as a Pareto-optimal choice for this dataset. Paired McNemar's tests with Holm correction demonstrate that the proposed model's improvements over the tested baselines are statistically significant ([Formula: see text]). Ablation studies validate that bidirectional processing increases accuracy by 20.12 pp over a unidirectional CNN-LSTM, and that the Extra Trees head boosts precision by 10.09 pp over the standalone Extra Trees baseline. This work contributes to hybrid deep learning for cyber-physical systems and provides deployment guidance in terms of computational cost and a human-in-the-loop framework. In future work, we will investigate cross-dataset validation, multi-simultaneous attack detection, graph neural networks for fault location, and federated learning toward privacy-preserving collaborative training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.