ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-driven data perturbation techniques for privacy-preserving data mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of digital information has raised many issues over the release of sensitive personal information in data mining activities due to the rapid expansion of the digital information. Privacy-Preserving Data Mining (PPDM) has the goal of allowing a significant analysis of data, as well as safeguarding confidential characteristics. Conventional privacy methods, like anonymization usually decrease the usefulness of data, and cryptographic methods are expensive to compute. This paper suggests a perturbation-based PPDM model, which will combine the K-means + + clustering algorithm with the Flip-and-Rotation Perturbation (FRP) algorithm and decision model based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The suggested solution would take the dimensionality of features before perturbation to ensure increased privacy and maintain classification value. Experimental testing to check on the proposed method proves that it has better performance in accuracy, precision, recall and the F-measure compared to the conventional Naive Bayes and fuzzy-based methods. These findings do confirm that the proposed framework is a useful trade-off in the balance of data utility and protection of privacy in structured datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.