ArticleScientific data2026
A Dataset of Widefield Fundus Images From Patients With Birdshot Chorioretinitis and Matched Control.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dataset of Widefield Fundus Images From Patients With Birdshot Chorioretinitis and Matched Control.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Birdshot chorioretinitis is a rare uveitis where research is limited by the lack of large, publicly available imaging datasets. To address this gap, we present Birdshot-Wide, a standardized retinal imaging dataset comprising 5,042 widefield fundus photographs from 742 eyes with birdshot chorioretinitis (BSCR) and 1,310 images from 742 age-and sex- matched healthy eyes controls. The BSCR cohort is longitudinal, with a median follow-up of 4.31 years. Each image in the BSCR cohort was manually reviewed for quality and classified by dominant lesion subtype. To demonstrate its utility, the dataset was benchmarked on a classification task, where deep learning models trained to differentiate BSCR from control images achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of up to 0.96. This dataset, with its detailed metadata, provides a valuable resource for biomarker discovery, the development of automated diagnostic tools, and disease progression modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.