ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Trajectories of internalizing problems during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: The effects of sex and early life stress.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated lockdowns had a detrimental impact on adolescent mental health, exacerbating levels of emotional difficulties that were already increasing in this population. The course of these difficulties after lockdown protocols ended, however, is not fully understood. Further, the effects of early life stress (ELS) and biological sex on mental health during and following the pandemic are also not clear. This study leverages data from a longitudinal project examining adolescent mental health that predates the pandemic. Internalizing problems were assessed in 222 children (58.6% females) ages 9-13 years at recruitment (baseline; 2013-2016) and at four more timepoints, each approximately two years apart. Participants also completed an interview assessing ELS at baseline. We assessed internalizing problems across each phase of the pandemic (i.e., pre-COVID, during the COVID lockdown, after reopening) as a function of ELS and biological sex. We found that whereas unpredictability-related ELS was associated with internalizing problems in girls across all COVID phases, the association between threat-related ELS and internalizing problems from pre-lockdown to post-reopening decreased in girls and increased in boys. Further, threat-related ELS was associated with post-reopening internalizing problems in boys through lower adaptability. Sensitivity analysis showed that the attenuation of the threat-internalizing association in girls and strengthening of the association in boys was not due to aging. Collectively, these findings suggest that there are sex- and ELS-specific changes in psychological functioning in relation to the pandemic. Further research is needed to better understand mechanisms that foster risk or resilience following stress exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.