ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026
How to frustrate a plant pathogen.
Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sequence-unrelated but structurally similar (SUSS) effector families represent a distinctive evolutionary strategy among plant pathogen virulence proteins. Within families such as MAX, LARS and RALPH effectors, individual proteins maintain nearly identical three-dimensional folds despite minimal sequence identities, whilst targeting functionally diverse host cellular processes. This decoupling of structural conservation from functional specificity challenges traditional precepts of the classic structure-function paradigm and reveals how pathogen effectors exploit stable protein scaffolds as platforms for rapid functional diversification through extreme sequence variation. Comparative structural analyses suggest that surface frustration, regions of local energetic instability essential for fold flexibility, may be conserved across SUSS family members despite sequence divergence. This conservation creates potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited for resistance engineering. Rather than targeting individual effector-host interactions, frustration-guided design of molecular sponges, synthetic integrated domains or proteome degradation warheads could potentially neutralise entire SUSS effector families. This review explores the mechanisms of functionalisation by SUSS effectors and suggests strategies combining structural genomics, surface frustration analysis and AI-driven protein design for developing broad-spectrum resistance against major classes of plant pathogen effectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.