ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2026
Assessing the Utility of Automated and Pen-And-Paper Cognitive Assessment Tools for Underrepresented Groups in the UK.
Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPen-and-paper cognitive assessment tools to detect dementia have higher rates of misdiagnosis amongst minority populations, especially those who complete the assessment in their second language. CognoSpeak is an automated cognitive assessment tool that uses machine learning to detect early signs of cognitive impairment from speech. We assess the utility of different pen-and-paper cognitive assessments and CognoSpeak in ethnic minority populations living in the UK.
methodsResearch champions from four community centres across Yorkshire recruited cognitively healthy adults from their community: 51 Somali, 50 South Asian (South Yorkshire), 50 Chinese, and 49 South Asian (West Yorkshire). Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), Multicultural Cognitive Examination (MCE), and CognoSpeak.
resultsA high percentage (47.5%) of participants recruited from ethnic minority community centres were misclassified as cognitively impaired with the MoCA, compared to just 3.4% in the RUDAS and 2% in the MCE. An acoustic-based SVM model analysis of responses to CognoSpeak achieved 83% accuracy in the ethnic minority cohort, at a similar rate to monolinguals (86%). Linguistic and text-based models showed higher levels of bias.
conclusionCognitive assessments, such as the MCE and RUDAS, may be superior to the MoCA in multilingual ethnic minority populations. Automated AI tools like CognoSpeak show promise in reducing healthcare burden in detecting dementia; however, additional work is required on managing implicit bias in any AI model before they could be clinically implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.