Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42250267›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2026

Assessing the Utility of Automated and Pen-And-Paper Cognitive Assessment Tools for Underrepresented Groups in the UK.

Caitlin H Illingworth, Madhurananda Pahar, Dorota Braun, Lise Sproson, Hina Khan, Bahman Mirheidari, Ronan O'Malley, Sahra Abdi, Muse Jama, Ismail Yussuf and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Caitlin H IllingworthDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3800-7999
Madhurananda PaharSchool of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Dorota BraunDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Lise SprosonDevices for Dignity, NIHR MedTech and In Vitro Diagnostics Co-Operatives, Sheffield, UK.
Hina KhanDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Bahman MirheidariSchool of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ronan O'MalleyDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sahra AbdiIsraac Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Muse JamaIsraac Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Ismail YussufIsraac Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Candice WangSheffield Chinese Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Sai LeeSheffield Chinese Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Sarah NgSheffield Chinese Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Nur AliShipShape Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Tanya BasharatShipShape Community Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Mohammed Akhlak RaufMeri Yaadain, Bradford, UK.
Aneela NadeemMeri Yaadain, Bradford, UK.
Heidi ChristensenSchool of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Daniel J BlackburnDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPen-and-paper cognitive assessment tools to detect dementia have higher rates of misdiagnosis amongst minority populations, especially those who complete the assessment in their second language. CognoSpeak is an automated cognitive assessment tool that uses machine learning to detect early signs of cognitive impairment from speech. We assess the utility of different pen-and-paper cognitive assessments and CognoSpeak in ethnic minority populations living in the UK.

methodsResearch champions from four community centres across Yorkshire recruited cognitively healthy adults from their community: 51 Somali, 50 South Asian (South Yorkshire), 50 Chinese, and 49 South Asian (West Yorkshire). Participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), Multicultural Cognitive Examination (MCE), and CognoSpeak.

resultsA high percentage (47.5%) of participants recruited from ethnic minority community centres were misclassified as cognitively impaired with the MoCA, compared to just 3.4% in the RUDAS and 2% in the MCE. An acoustic-based SVM model analysis of responses to CognoSpeak achieved 83% accuracy in the ethnic minority cohort, at a similar rate to monolinguals (86%). Linguistic and text-based models showed higher levels of bias.

conclusionCognitive assessments, such as the MCE and RUDAS, may be superior to the MoCA in multilingual ethnic minority populations. Automated AI tools like CognoSpeak show promise in reducing healthcare burden in detecting dementia; however, additional work is required on managing implicit bias in any AI model before they could be clinically implemented.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaEthnicityMental Status and Dementia TestsMinority GroupsNeuropsychological TestsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Kingdombilingualscognitive assessmentdementiaethnic minority groups

Identifiers

PMID42250267
PMCPMC13242258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.