ArticleHealth economics2026
Timing Matters: How Unconditional Cash Transfer Frequency Shapes Dietary Choices Among Vulnerable Older Adults.
Article in Health economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-income elderly consumers, often overlooked in studies of public financial assistance programs, may face challenges in managing resources to maintain dietary health. This study examines how the payment frequency of an unconditional cash transfer program impacts dietary behaviors among low-income elderly populations in Colombia. Using nationally representative data from a federal financial assistance program, we implement a Multivalued Treatment Model with Propensity Score Matching and Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting to assess the effects of monthly versus bi-monthly payments on food expenditures, dietary diversity, and diet quality. Results show that monthly payments enhance dietary diversity and diet quality by supporting healthier food purchases compared to bi-monthly payments. Subgroup analyses revealed that older seniors and males benefit most from monthly payments. Mechanisms explored include consumption smoothing and subjective wealth perceptions, with findings suggesting that more frequent and predictable income flows may foster greater perceived financial stability. The study advances consumer behavior theory by linking payment frequency to dietary outcomes and offers practical implications for optimizing financial assistance programs. While bi-monthly payments reduce administrative costs, monthly payments are recommended to improve dietary health. These findings contribute to understanding income timing's role in fostering healthier consumer behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.