Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42250205›Full record

ReviewRadiological physics and technology2026

Towards integrating domain knowledge, AutoML and few-shot learning for medical image analysis: a mini review of current trends and research gaps.

Nitiyaa Ragu, Jason Teo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nitiyaa RaguFaculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.
Jason TeoFaculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia. jtwteo@ums.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2415-5915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image analysis is essential for modern diagnostics, as it enables accurate and rapid disease detection. However, traditional deep learning models require large, annotated datasets, which are frequently inaccessible in medical scenarios due to data scarcity, privacy constraints, and excessive labeling costs. Few-Shot Learning (FSL) and Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) have appeared as effective techniques to address these issues. FSL utilizes meta-learning and metric-based strategies enabling models to learn from small samples, while AutoML automates model design and optimization, reducing reliance on expert intervention. Additionally, the integration of domain-specific knowledge, including anatomical priors and clinically relevant features, has demonstrated enhancements in interpretability and diagnostic significance. This mini review offers a structured analysis of FSL, AutoML, and domain-specific knowledge in medical image analysis, emphasizing their potential integration. A critical evaluation of existing literature reveals that most studies use these approaches independently. The review further examines methodological limitations, dataset constraints, and clinical applicability challenges across current studies. Based on these findings, key research gaps are identified, such as the need for domain-informed architecture search, standardized evaluation protocols, and pipelines that use less computer power. Notably, metric-based FSL approaches were more widely used than gradient-based methods due to their stability under limited data conditions. However, the literature is still methodologically fragmented, with FSL, AutoML, and domain-specific knowledge mainly studied separately or in partial combinations. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions toward the development of AutoML-enhanced FSL frameworks integrated with domain-specific knowledge to improve performance, interpretability, and clinical reliability in data-constrained environments.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKnowledgeMachine LearningAutomationEvidence GapsHumansAutomated machine learning (AutoML)Data scarcityDomain-specific knowledgeFew-shot learning (FSL)Medical image analysisMeta-learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.