ReviewRadiological physics and technology2026
Towards integrating domain knowledge, AutoML and few-shot learning for medical image analysis: a mini review of current trends and research gaps.
Review in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical image analysis is essential for modern diagnostics, as it enables accurate and rapid disease detection. However, traditional deep learning models require large, annotated datasets, which are frequently inaccessible in medical scenarios due to data scarcity, privacy constraints, and excessive labeling costs. Few-Shot Learning (FSL) and Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) have appeared as effective techniques to address these issues. FSL utilizes meta-learning and metric-based strategies enabling models to learn from small samples, while AutoML automates model design and optimization, reducing reliance on expert intervention. Additionally, the integration of domain-specific knowledge, including anatomical priors and clinically relevant features, has demonstrated enhancements in interpretability and diagnostic significance. This mini review offers a structured analysis of FSL, AutoML, and domain-specific knowledge in medical image analysis, emphasizing their potential integration. A critical evaluation of existing literature reveals that most studies use these approaches independently. The review further examines methodological limitations, dataset constraints, and clinical applicability challenges across current studies. Based on these findings, key research gaps are identified, such as the need for domain-informed architecture search, standardized evaluation protocols, and pipelines that use less computer power. Notably, metric-based FSL approaches were more widely used than gradient-based methods due to their stability under limited data conditions. However, the literature is still methodologically fragmented, with FSL, AutoML, and domain-specific knowledge mainly studied separately or in partial combinations. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions toward the development of AutoML-enhanced FSL frameworks integrated with domain-specific knowledge to improve performance, interpretability, and clinical reliability in data-constrained environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42250205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.